 |
From Wayne D.: Tom’s noon updates are very helpful. In the midst of a turbulent market, it’s reassuring to know the leaders of our investment team are out in front, providing insight and encouragement.
From Elizabeth D.: Love the noon thoughts, Tom. It’s very helpful to see how the pros at PBRG think—from day to day, event to event. I hope you can continue—if not daily, at least every so often.
From Jeff J.: Since Mark wrote about writing in the August 31 Daily, I have to haul him (or your editors?) onto the carpet. You used the word “proliferate” as an adjective. It’s a verb. The adjective is “proliferative,” though I’m not sure that would be the appropriate word for what Mark was trying to say.
As a writer and editor, I will say I enjoy reading Mark’s work. Too many important messages are marred by poor or even lousy writing skills… or a complete lack of proofreading and editing.
Reeves’ Comment: Jeff, great catch. You’re right, we dropped the editorial ball here. Thanks for pointing this out. (While we’re on the topic, are you looking for proofing/editing work?)
From David M.: I just read the August issue of Retirement Insider. Bob’s discussion on sleep was right on point. I wanted to say it “woke me up,” but as a retired Air Force pilot, I’ve been aware of this problem for many years.
Many professions, such as airline and military pilots, require periods of crew rest. There’s no such requirement in the medical profession… despite ample evidence of doctors being on duty for 36 hours or more.
How many sane people want a doctor making critical decisions about their health—or their lives—after being on duty for 33 hours? Can anyone that sleep deprived be counted on to make life-affecting decisions? And what about liability? Lawyers could have a field day…
Reeves’ Comment: Great point, David. Perhaps “How long have you been awake?” should become a top question for your surgeon or practitioner… before going under the knife or taking any advice.